Unfit for consumption: microbiological risks of natural water sources in rural areas

Authors

  • Inês Rodrigues Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Ofélia Godinho CIMAR/CIIMAR– Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Olga Lage Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CIMAR/CIIMAR– Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Sandra Quinteira Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CIBIO—Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Research Network in Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Associated Laboratory, University of Porto, Campus de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7,4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, Campus de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Toxicologic Pathology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; Associate Laboratory i4HB - Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences - CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2025.383

Keywords:

Poster

Abstract

Background: Access to clean and safe water is vital for public health [1], especially in rural areas, where many households depend on untreated natural water sources [2]. Objective: This cross-sectional study combines an epidemiological survey with microbiological analysis to assess the risks of untreated water consumption and identify populations vulnerable to waterborne diseases. Methods: Drinking water samples were collected from 31 wells (on private properties) and 9 natural streams (fountains) across two parishes (Chaves municipality). Samples were analyzed according to Decreto-Lei 69/2023, following ISO standards for total heterotrophic microorganisms, total coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., and Clostridium perfringens. A survey was conducted to understand water usage patterns and identify at-risk populations. Epidemiological data on age, water usage, preferences, and contamination sources were collected from 28 households (58 individuals). Results: Microbiological analysis showed that 93% (37 out of 40) of samples were unsafe for consumption. Well water was heavily contaminated, with coliform bacteria (90%), Escherichia coli (55%), Enterococcus spp. (55%), and Clostridium perfringens (52%). Only two well water samples and one natural stream sample were in conformity with the legislation. The majority of individuals involved in the study (61%) belonged to age groups at higher risk (<15 years – 2% and >65 years – 59%), therefore more susceptible to waterborne diseases. Among households, 93% used well water, primarily for irrigation (48%), hygiene (17%), cooking and laundry (15% each), and drinking (5%). Twenty-nine percent drank water from natural streams. When asked about drinking preferences, 32% favored bottled water, 22% chose mains water, 18% preferred stream water, and 7% well water. Regarding contamination sources, 86% of households had small horticultural operations, 64% kept farm animals, and although most households (89%) had public sanitation, 11% still relied on septic tanks. Conclusions: This study suggests that untreated water sources, such as wells and natural streams, may pose health risks in rural areas. Many households rely on these sources without full awareness of contamination risks, increasing their vulnerability to waterborne diseases. The study also has a citizen science component, as results will be shared with the local population to raise awareness and promote safe water usage practices. 

References

1. WHO (2022). A field guide to improving small drinking-water supplies: water safety planning for rural communities. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

2. Lee, D., & Murphy, H. M. (2020). Private Wells and Rural Health: Groundwater Contaminants of Emerging Concern. Curr Environ Health Rep 2020, 7, 129–139, doi: 10.1007/s40572-020-00267-4

Downloads

Published

2025-05-27

How to Cite

Rodrigues, I., Godinho, O., Lage, O., & Quinteira, S. (2025). Unfit for consumption: microbiological risks of natural water sources in rural areas. Scientific Letters, 1(Sup 1). https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2025.383

Issue

Section

Posters

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.