Toxicity of resin-matrix composites in dentistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2024.239Keywords:
PosterAbstract
Background: Resin-matrix composites (RMC) are widely used as restorative materials due to their mechanical, optical, and aesthetic properties. However, some concerns have emerged due to polymerization shrinkage, material degradation, and the release of monomers from the organic matrix, such as the derivatives of bisphenol A (BPA), which are potentially toxic [1-3]. Therefore, it is important to understand the factors that contribute to the incomplete monomer conversion of RMC [1,4].Objective: This systematic review aims to comprehensively explore the factors contributing to the toxicity associated with RMC and to establish clinical criteria that reduce the release of residual monomers. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA criteria. A PICO question was established and three databases, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science were selected to run this research. Filters were established to retrieve articles in the last 20 years, in English. The inclusion criteria were in vivostudies/humans, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and toxicity studies. The study characteristics of the included articles were extracted using a predefined Excel file. Results: A total of 1,261 articles were retrieved from the three electronic databases. Following the elimination of duplicates, a total of 1,227 articles remained for further selection by title and abstract, after which 20 articles were subjected to comprehensive reading; 13 articles were included and 7 excluded. The analysis of the selected articles indicated that low levels of monomers were detected in the participants´ saliva and urine, suggesting relatively low local and systemic toxicity. Dental operator-dependent factors were identified. Adherence to RMC placement protocols is essential. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that low levels of free monomers were detected in participants with RMC and adherence to manufacturer’s instructions is important. Further studies are needed to stablish causality, considering the exposure to non-dental BPA source materials.References
1. Worthington, H.V.; Khangura, S.; Seal, K.; Mierzwinski-Urban, M.; Veitz-Keenan, A.; Sahrmann, P., et al. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2021) Aug 13;2021(8).
2. Peutzfeldt, A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci. (1997);105:97–116.
3. Dursun, E.; Fron-Chabouis, H.; Attal, J.P.; Raskin, A. Bisphenol A Release: Survey of the Composition of Dental Composite Resins. OpenDent J. (2016) Sep 2;10(1):446–53.
4. Pingale, P.L.; Saudagar, N.R.; Rajput, A.P.; Rajpoot, K.; Tekade, M.; Pingale, A., et al. Toxicity of dental materials and ways to screen their biosafety. In: Essentials of Pharmatoxicol Drug Res: Toxicity and Toxicodynamics: Vol. 1. Elsevier; (2023) p. 435–68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Cordeiro, Ana T. P. C. Gomes, Rita Fidalgo-Pereira, Patrícia Correia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In Scientific Letters, articles are published under a CC-BY license (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License), the most open license available. The users can share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), as long as they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (read the full text of the license terms and conditions of use).
The author is the owner of the copyright.