Cannabis-based therapies in chronic pain management: A systematic review of clinical trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2025.378Keywords:
PosterAbstract
Background: Chronic pain affects millions worldwide, driving the need for effective treatment alternatives. Cannabis-based therapies have gained attention for their potential analgesic effects, but their efficacy and safety remain a topic of debate [1]. Objective: This review examines clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of cannabis-derived treatments, including FDA-approved cannabinoid medications such as CBD (Epidiolex®), a combination of ∆9-THC and CBD (Sativex®), and synthetic cannabinoids like nabilone (Cesamet®) and dronabinol (Marinol® and Syndros®). Methods: A search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception through to October 31, 2024. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to identify clinical trials evaluating only randomized double-blind clinical trials that compared the effects of cannabinoids with a placebo or standard treatment, lasted at least 4 weeks after the start of treatment, and used one of the internationally validated pain intensity scales. Results: While some studies report reductions in pain intensity and improvements in associated symptoms, others show limited or no significant benefit. The outcome variability highlights the need for further research to determine optimal formulations, doses, and patient populations that may benefit most. Conclusions: While cannabis-based treatments hold promise for chronic pain management, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This review highlights the urgent need for more rigorous clinical trials to establish definitive safety and efficacy profiles before these therapies can be widely adopted in clinical practice.
References
1. Matos, C.; et al. Cannabis for chronic pain: Mechanistic insights and therapeutic challenges. Stresses 2025, 5, 7, doi:10.3390/stresses5010007.
2. Nurmikko, T.J. et al. Sativex successfully treats neuropathic pain characterised by allodynia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain 2007, 133, 210–220, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.028.
3. Frank, B. et al. . Comparison of analgesic effects and patient tolerability of nabilone and dihydrocodeine for chronic neuropathic pain: Randomised, crossover, double blind study. BMJ 2008, 336, 199–201, doi:10.1136/bmj.39429.619653.80.
4. Ware, M.A. et al. Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2010, 182, E694–E701, doi:10.1503/cmaj.091414.
5. Lynch, M.E. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot trial with extension using an oral mucosal cannabinoid extract for treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2014, 47, 166–173, doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.018.
6. Turcotte, D. et al. Nabilone as an adjunctive to babapentin for multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pain Med. 2015, 16, 149–159, doi:10.1111/pme.12569.
7. Fallon, M.T. et al. Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. Br. J. Pain 2017, 11, 119–133, doi:10.1177/2049463717710042.
8. de Vries, M. et al. Pain and Nociception Neuroscience Research Group. Tetrahydrocannabinol does not reduce pain in patients with chronic abdominal pain in a phase 2 placebo-controlled study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 15, 1079–1086.e4, doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.147.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Carla Matos , Ana Teresa Pereira , Maria João Dias , Rui Salvador , Carla Sousa , Ana Ferreira Vinha , Márcia Carvalho , Carla Guimarães Moutinho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In Scientific Letters, articles are published under a CC-BY license (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License), the most open license available. The users can share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), as long as they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (read the full text of the license terms and conditions of use).
The author is the owner of the copyright.