The ecotoxicity evaluation of Gens ponds: are the pH values a confounding factor?

Authors

  • R. Pereira FCUP, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre S/N, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal, Country
  • B. S. Diogo FCUP, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre S/N, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal, Country; ICBAS, Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Por-to, Portugal; CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, 4450-208, Matosinhos, Portugal
  • I. Rodrigues Gondomar Town Hall, Praça Manuel Guedes, 4420-193, Gondomar, Portugal
  • S. C. Antunes FCUP, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre S/N, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal, Country; CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, 4450-208, Matosinhos, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.40

Keywords:

Poster

Abstract

Background: Portuguese polymetallic mining activities were important for local development of economy and ceased in 1970s. However, these activities leave amounts of tailings susceptible to erosion and chemical weathering, representing a potential risk to the environment, due to a high concentration of heavy metals and acidic mine drainages [1,2]. Gens ponds arose due to open pit mining in a gold-antimony mine in Gondomar (north of Portugal). Objective: Evaluate the ecotoxicological effect of natural water samples from these ponds in Lemna minor (growth inhibition) and Daphnia magna (acute immobilization, survival, and feeding rate inhibition assays) along seasons from one year. Methods: The assays were performed according to standard guidelines using the natural water samples from each pond (P1, P2, and P3) and the same samples with pH adjustment (BP1, BP2, and BP3) according to the optimal value for the organisms tested. Results: L. minor showed a significant decrease in fronds number in all samples. However, after pH adjustment, the number of fronds increase significantly in summer samples (BP1 and BP2). D. magna exposed to P1 and P2 showed 100% mortality in less than 24 h, while P3 only after 48h was recorded mortality. Overall, BP1, BP2, and BP3 do not affect D. magna survival, however, a significant decrease in the feeding rate was observed, in BP1 and BP2 in summer samples. Nevertheless, the winter samples showed an increase in feeding rate after exposure to BP1, BP2, and BP3. Conclusions: The results emphasize the importance of conducting ecotoxicological studies in acidic mine drainage, as Gens Ponds, to assess the effects on the ecosystem health. Further studies will be necessary to evaluate the toxicity of these ponds, considering other physical and chemical characteristics (e.g., metals and nutrients), as well as other model organisms and endpoints from different levels of biological organization.

References

1. Antunes, I.M.H.R.; Albuquerque, M.T.D. Using Indicator Kriging for the Evaluation of Arsenic Potential Contamination in an Abandoned Mining Area (Portugal). Science of the Total Environment 2013, 442, 545–552.

2. Pereira, R.; Ribeiro, R.; Gonçalves, F. Plan for an Integrated Human and Environmental Risk Assessment in the S. Domingos Mine Area (Portugal). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2004, 10, 543–578.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-21

How to Cite

Pereira, R., Diogo, B. S., Rodrigues, I., & Antunes, S. C. (2023). The ecotoxicity evaluation of Gens ponds: are the pH values a confounding factor?. Scientific Letters, 1(Sup 1). https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.40

Issue

Section

Posters

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.