Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification

Authors

  • Ana F. Morais Associate Laboratory i4HB - Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences - CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira Associate Laboratory i4HB - Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences - CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; FOREN—Forensic Science Experts, 1400-136 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Carlos J. A. Ribeiro Associate Laboratory i4HB - Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences - CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; Avextra Portugal SA, 1070-060 Lisboa, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.506

Keywords:

Poster

Abstract

Background: Cannabis sativa L. has become widely cultivated. The inflorescences, resins, and oils derived from this plant are employed for both medicinal and recreational purposes, primarily due to the effects associated with cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and the psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). However, cannabis plants biosynthesize these compounds in their acidic forms, necessitating a decarboxylation process during the extraction phase [1]. Moreover, depending on the final formulation, the extracts may undergo further purification before being incorporated into the final product. These steps enhance the quality of the end product and increase its attractiveness to consumers [2]. Objective: This research aims to understand the variations in Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA), Δ9-THC, and cannabinol (CBN) during the sample processing of the THC-rich cultivar Z-Face. The processing steps include the decarboxylation of acidic cannabinoids, Soxhlet extraction, and purification of extracts through winterization and activated charcoal treatment. Methods: Decarboxylation was performed at 120 ºC for 1 hour. This was followed by a 2-hour Soxhlet extraction with 96% ethanol to extract cannabinoids. The solution underwent winterization at -80 ºC for 24 hours to remove waxes and lipids. Finally, 50% (w/w) activated charcoal was added and mixed for 1 hour to remove chlorophyll and other pigments. Cannabinoid quantification was conducted using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC-DAD system, equipped with an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (3.0 x 150 mm, 2.7 µm) [3]. Results: Each step was refined by: (i) Conducting decarboxylation studies at varying temperatures and durations to effectively convert Δ9-THCA into Δ9-THC, while achieving minimal CBN formation; (ii) Optimizing Soxhlet extraction time and number of cycles; (iii) Determining the appropriate winterization temperature and duration; and (iv) Examining the percentage of activated charcoal used, along with the temperature and duration of treatment. Conclusions: The extraction and processing of THC-rich Z-Face flowers, initially containing 16.5% Δ9-THCA (15.6% total Δ9-THC), resulted in final extracts with 58.9% Δ9-THC, corresponding to an 8.9% enrichment during the purification steps.

References

1. Silva, E.M.P. et al. Recent HPLC-UV Approaches for Cannabinoid Analysis: From Extraction to Method Validation and Quantification Compliance. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 786–786, doi:10.3390/ph18060786.

2. López-Olmos, C. et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Industrial Cannabinoid Extraction Techniques: Evaluation of the Most Relevant Patents and Studies at Pilot Scale. Front Nat Prod 2022, 1, doi:10.3389/fntpr.2022.1043147.

3. Morais, A.F. et al. Optimization and validation of an HPLC-DAD Method for the Identification of 14 Cannabinoids: Application in Cannabis sativa L extracts. Sci Lett 2025, 1 (Sup 1), doi:10.48797/sl.2025.319.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Morais, A. F., Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., & Ribeiro, C. J. A. (2026). Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification. Scientific Letters, 1(Sup 1). https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.506

Issue

Section

Posters

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.