Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.506Keywords:
PosterAbstract
Background: Cannabis sativa L. has become widely cultivated. The inflorescences, resins, and oils derived from this plant are employed for both medicinal and recreational purposes, primarily due to the effects associated with cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and the psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). However, cannabis plants biosynthesize these compounds in their acidic forms, necessitating a decarboxylation process during the extraction phase [1]. Moreover, depending on the final formulation, the extracts may undergo further purification before being incorporated into the final product. These steps enhance the quality of the end product and increase its attractiveness to consumers [2]. Objective: This research aims to understand the variations in Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA), Δ9-THC, and cannabinol (CBN) during the sample processing of the THC-rich cultivar Z-Face. The processing steps include the decarboxylation of acidic cannabinoids, Soxhlet extraction, and purification of extracts through winterization and activated charcoal treatment. Methods: Decarboxylation was performed at 120 ºC for 1 hour. This was followed by a 2-hour Soxhlet extraction with 96% ethanol to extract cannabinoids. The solution underwent winterization at -80 ºC for 24 hours to remove waxes and lipids. Finally, 50% (w/w) activated charcoal was added and mixed for 1 hour to remove chlorophyll and other pigments. Cannabinoid quantification was conducted using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC-DAD system, equipped with an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (3.0 x 150 mm, 2.7 µm) [3]. Results: Each step was refined by: (i) Conducting decarboxylation studies at varying temperatures and durations to effectively convert Δ9-THCA into Δ9-THC, while achieving minimal CBN formation; (ii) Optimizing Soxhlet extraction time and number of cycles; (iii) Determining the appropriate winterization temperature and duration; and (iv) Examining the percentage of activated charcoal used, along with the temperature and duration of treatment. Conclusions: The extraction and processing of THC-rich Z-Face flowers, initially containing 16.5% Δ9-THCA (15.6% total Δ9-THC), resulted in final extracts with 58.9% Δ9-THC, corresponding to an 8.9% enrichment during the purification steps.
References
1. Silva, E.M.P. et al. Recent HPLC-UV Approaches for Cannabinoid Analysis: From Extraction to Method Validation and Quantification Compliance. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 786–786, doi:10.3390/ph18060786.
2. López-Olmos, C. et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Industrial Cannabinoid Extraction Techniques: Evaluation of the Most Relevant Patents and Studies at Pilot Scale. Front Nat Prod 2022, 1, doi:10.3389/fntpr.2022.1043147.
3. Morais, A.F. et al. Optimization and validation of an HPLC-DAD Method for the Identification of 14 Cannabinoids: Application in Cannabis sativa L extracts. Sci Lett 2025, 1 (Sup 1), doi:10.48797/sl.2025.319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ana F. Morais, Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, Carlos J. A. Ribeiro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In Scientific Letters, articles are published under a CC-BY license (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License), the most open license available. The users can share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), as long as they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (read the full text of the license terms and conditions of use).
The author is the owner of the copyright.






